Also in this region, children will be travelling to school in large groups for the first time. In September there is a peak in the number of traffic victims in the age group 0-14 years. A salient detail is that one third of these victims are on the way to or from school. Children are an unpredictable group.
The article goes on to explain that in 1972 the average age at which Dutch children went unaccompanied to school was six years. By 2006 this had risen to 8.6 years of age. The reason given by parents for this rise is that they find the conditions too dangerous. This is an issue of subjective safety of course.
The approach suggested by the safety pressure group here is different to what might be expected in the UK and other countries. They are suggesting that children should be allowed greater freedom earlier as more and earlier experience makes children safer on the roads: Practice in traffic is an important part of bringing up children.
VVN calls on parents to send their children to school by foot or by bike as often as possible. It is important to choose the safest route possible and to practice this route with your children. Children only learn by doing, and children become safer as they travel independently to school.
A safe road environment around the school is important. Other participants in traffic around the school play a part.
The view is that it isn't children who cause a problem but adults, and that children should be able to travel unaccompanied by the age of six. An average age of eight, as now, is a bit too old.
Veilig Verkeer Nederland has also been running spots on the radio about the danger posed to children by drivers:
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
The banners are a cheap enough way to bring the change in school traffic to the notice of drivers etc. I did wonder if "traffic victims" are children that are knocked down by cars or those that fall off their bikes on their own or a mix? The term is a bit vague. From a quick assessment here in the UK a greater proportion of children cycle to school (claimed to be 8%) than adults who cycle to work (2% ?), so our schools, or at least the nations children are still "a best example". Mark Garrett, Bristol UK
2 comments:
The banners are a cheap enough way to bring the change in school traffic to the notice of drivers etc. I did wonder if "traffic victims" are children that are knocked down by cars or those that fall off their bikes on their own or a mix? The term is a bit vague.
From a quick assessment here in the UK a greater proportion of children cycle to school (claimed to be 8%) than adults who cycle to work (2% ?), so our schools, or at least the nations children are still "a best example".
Mark Garrett, Bristol UK
I don't know where your statistics come from, Mark. The latest figures show a continuing decline in Scotland, for example.
Cycling to school in Scotland is also in decline, the new figures show, from 1.5 per cent in 2008 to 1 per cent last year.
Post a Comment